Details for {{filter.source}} → {{filter.destination}}

Timestamp Active Success rate (last 1min) Throughput Decision
{{ o.datetime }} {{ o.active }} {{ o.success|number:2 }}% {{ o.throughput|number:3 }} MB/s Fixed number of actives ({{ optimizer.fixed.active }}) Bandwidth restriction are set to {{ o.bandwidth_limits.source|number:2 }} MB/s on the source {{ o.bandwidth_limits.destination|number:2 }} MB/s on the destination Either source or destination endpoint reached the maximum number of active transfers per link (or endpoint) Good link efficiency, current average throughput is larger than the preceding average throughput and retrials steady or decreasing Good link efficiency, current average throughput is high and retrials steady or decreasing Good link efficiency, throughput is steady or little higher than the previous sample, retrials steady or decreasing, push one more transfer Good link efficiency, either LAN transfer, optimizer plan has been set to agressive mode(2,3) or a single source endpoint exists Good link efficiency, active transfers will remain steady Good link efficiency, but recoverable errors started increasing (e.g. timeouts) Good link efficiency, throughput deterioration as caused by congestion due to too many active transfers Good link efficiency, throughput deterioration as caused by congestion due to too many active transfers Good link efficiency, throughput deterioration as caused by congestion due to too many active transfers Good link efficiency, current average throughput is smaller than the previous average throughput Bad link efficiency but progressively improving, active transfers remain steady until the next sample to check Bad link efficiency, reduce the number of active transfers Steady, optimizer has not taken any decision Steady, not enough feedback

Fixed number of actives configured
Increase number of active
Keep number of active
Decrease number of active
Limited bandwidth